Thats kind of an innacurate statement. How many 6.4's have broken the crank outside of catastrophic failure?
How many high torque at low RPM 6.4's have bent rods.
I rest my case
how many lifters have failed vs bent rods?
failure rate of a 6.4?
1 - lifters
2 - fuel system (mostly self induced)
3 - pistons
4 - rods
5 - crank
Now a drag, sled pull truck, much different then a daily driver. If I had a sled pull truck, drag truck, etc. If I was rich id buy rods. Also if someone else was doing the build for me, then it would make the rods for feasible as i'd hate to pay labor twice.
if im a poor working class fool with a hobby, well i'd buy a second engine as a contingency plan if the first failed. 4x4 launches - an extra t case and front driveshaft, modified vehicle - extra transmission. I bought all 3 for $750 (engine had bad lifter) so for myself I will run stock rods with a 71 or 72. I also run stock head bolts, so I hope to pop head gaskets prior to rods to relieve some of the stress, lol.
Still don't see how its an inaccurate statement, when all one is doing is proceeding to the next weak link in line. what's next after rods then of failing? (base engine. fuel system aside)
Just to be accurate I bought a truck that had a bent rod. Piston was cracked at the pin. valve was burnt. Fuel system was ****. So yeah the rod bent, but the rod was not at fault. An aftermarket rod would have suffered the same fate, that or the next weakest link would have.
I'm also not against rods, lightning's are known for weak rods. I put eagle h beam rods in it. They were only $700 though and good for 800 hp. With that said there are guys that are running 10's on stock rods, I was too worried to run low 12's on factory rods.