Wastegate Setup Tial WG ??

Taylor D

New member
Joined
Jul 31, 2012
Messages
395
Reaction score
0
Location
Sebring, Florida
That's how mine is set up as well. Mine took roughly 3.5-4 clockwise turns to get it really close.

Okay so back it all the way off and then go 3-4 turns clockwise what psi fid it bring yours to by doing this

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk
 

webb06

Active member
Joined
Aug 14, 2012
Messages
3,888
Reaction score
9
Location
Seneca, MO
Ya start with 3 and see what EBP comes to. Are you on stock chargers? I've got tow power x chargers and I run about 58psi with EBP 84 actual
 

Charles

Well-known member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
2,727
Reaction score
32
Any of you with schemes involving pressure to the bottom of the gate being necessary to open the valve, you will lose control if you blow, rupture or in any way kill that line. Ask me how I know...

For this reason I recommend using a 4 port solenoid with a super light spring and shifting from full boost to the top port when below your desired boost, to then having some smaller amount of boost to the bottom port as the solenoid shifts the spool, automatically sending the top port to exhaust and bottom port to pressure. This is fail safe, in that losing the top line immediately makes the truck a dog around town. Losing the top line at full song changes absolutely nothing. When you come back down off of power the truck is a dog. Losing the bottom line means your boost will creep on you. Something you can see and the total creep won't be much if your spring is sized soft enough. The little bit of creep potential is worth the snappy response off a shift with full boost swinging from bottom to top, back to bottom again. Loads of valve control with this scheme.

In contrast.... if you run full boost to the bottom port, then regulate pressure to the top port and you blow that reference line to the bottom port get ready for stratospheric boost with compounds... It will jump so fast and so high that the motor is probably already hurt before you notice, unless you're spinning the wee out of small chargers that won't go stupid if left to their own devices.

If you don't have an electronic boost control, which is likely, then simply set the spring soft enough that with no lines connected to the gate the truck will undershoot your desired boost a bit. Then run regulated air to the top port and simply vent the bottom port to hit your target boost. This way it is failSAFE, in that a blown line means the truck lays over and boost returns to the sub-par number you set on spring only... The downside being that it will be a bit softer on shifts to hit back to desired boost. But not by much.


Words from someone who's lifted heads with a blown signal line as configured in a way that relied on a full manifold signal to the bottom port.


On Edit:

Besides... the damn things are much easier to assemble without all the cock diesel springs in them...
 
Last edited:

webb06

Active member
Joined
Aug 14, 2012
Messages
3,888
Reaction score
9
Location
Seneca, MO
Any of you with schemes involving pressure to the bottom of the gate being necessary to open the valve, you will lose control if you blow, rupture or in any way kill that line. Ask me how I know...

For this reason I recommend using a 4 port solenoid with a super light spring and shifting from full boost to the top port when below your desired boost, to then having some smaller amount of boost to the bottom port as the solenoid shifts the spool, automatically sending the top port to exhaust and bottom port to pressure. This is fail safe, in that losing the top line immediately makes the truck a dog around town. Losing the top line at full song changes absolutely nothing. When you come back down off of power the truck is a dog. Losing the bottom line means your boost will creep on you. Something you can see and the total creep won't be much if your spring is sized soft enough. The little bit of creep potential is worth the snappy response off a shift with full boost swinging from bottom to top, back to bottom again. Loads of valve control with this scheme.

In contrast.... if you run full boost to the bottom port, then regulate pressure to the top port and you blow that reference line to the bottom port get ready for stratospheric boost with compounds... It will jump so fast and so high that the motor is probably already hurt before you notice, unless you're spinning the wee out of small chargers that won't go stupid if left to their own devices.

If you don't have an electronic boost control, which is likely, then simply set the spring soft enough that with no lines connected to the gate the truck will undershoot your desired boost a bit. Then run regulated air to the top port and simply vent the bottom port to hit your target boost. This way it is failSAFE, in that a blown line means the truck lays over and boost returns to the sub-par number you set on spring only... The downside being that it will be a bit softer on shifts to hit back to desired boost. But not by much.


Words from someone who's lifted heads with a blown signal line as configured in a way that relied on a full manifold signal to the bottom port.


On Edit:

Besides... the damn things are much easier to assemble without all the cock diesel springs in them...

that just went WAY over my head haha:lookaround:
 

B585Ford

New member
Joined
Mar 17, 2012
Messages
2,730
Reaction score
0
Location
WV
Okay so back it all the way off and then go 3-4 turns clockwise what psi fid it bring yours to by doing this

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

I assumed the gate was opening causing your issues, but guess I should confirm. What was your EBP at 23 psi boost and could you hear the gate open?
 

sootie

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 3, 2012
Messages
11,843
Reaction score
35
Any of you with schemes involving pressure to the bottom of the gate being necessary to open the valve, you will lose control if you blow, rupture or in any way kill that line. Ask me how I know...

For this reason I recommend using a 4 port solenoid with a super light spring and shifting from full boost to the top port when below your desired boost, to then having some smaller amount of boost to the bottom port as the solenoid shifts the spool, automatically sending the top port to exhaust and bottom port to pressure. This is fail safe, in that losing the top line immediately makes the truck a dog around town. Losing the top line at full song changes absolutely nothing. When you come back down off of power the truck is a dog. Losing the bottom line means your boost will creep on you. Something you can see and the total creep won't be much if your spring is sized soft enough. The little bit of creep potential is worth the snappy response off a shift with full boost swinging from bottom to top, back to bottom again. Loads of valve control with this scheme.

In contrast.... if you run full boost to the bottom port, then regulate pressure to the top port and you blow that reference line to the bottom port get ready for stratospheric boost with compounds... It will jump so fast and so high that the motor is probably already hurt before you notice, unless you're spinning the wee out of small chargers that won't go stupid if left to their own devices.

If you don't have an electronic boost control, which is likely, then simply set the spring soft enough that with no lines connected to the gate the truck will undershoot your desired boost a bit. Then run regulated air to the top port and simply vent the bottom port to hit your target boost. This way it is failSAFE, in that a blown line means the truck lays over and boost returns to the sub-par number you set on spring only... The downside being that it will be a bit softer on shifts to hit back to desired boost. But not by much.


Words from someone who's lifted heads with a blown signal line as configured in a way that relied on a full manifold signal to the bottom port.


On Edit:

Besides... the damn things are much easier to assemble without all the cock diesel springs in them...


great post. i have a simple way of achieving much the same. use the strongest spring combination (was roughly 35psi worth testing with shop air on mine), open side port and regulated boost to the top.

that way-if the regulated line fails, 35psi is enough to drive the truck but too low to wreck anything.
 
Joined
Oct 1, 2012
Messages
5,868
Reaction score
0
Location
Athens, IL
I'm not a fan of unregulated boost to help open the gate. Actually I don't like any boost to help open the gate. Use spring pressure and the drive pressure will open it on its own. Then use regulated air to hold it closed. Done simple and fail proof.


I agree Charles, just a little complicated for most.

Nice to see you back.
 

Taylor D

New member
Joined
Jul 31, 2012
Messages
395
Reaction score
0
Location
Sebring, Florida
Any of you with schemes involving pressure to the bottom of the gate being necessary to open the valve, you will lose control if you blow, rupture or in any way kill that line. Ask me how I know...

For this reason I recommend using a 4 port solenoid with a super light spring and shifting from full boost to the top port when below your desired boost, to then having some smaller amount of boost to the bottom port as the solenoid shifts the spool, automatically sending the top port to exhaust and bottom port to pressure. This is fail safe, in that losing the top line immediately makes the truck a dog around town. Losing the top line at full song changes absolutely nothing. When you come back down off of power the truck is a dog. Losing the bottom line means your boost will creep on you. Something you can see and the total creep won't be much if your spring is sized soft enough. The little bit of creep potential is worth the snappy response off a shift with full boost swinging from bottom to top, back to bottom again. Loads of valve control with this scheme.

In contrast.... if you run full boost to the bottom port, then regulate pressure to the top port and you blow that reference line to the bottom port get ready for stratospheric boost with compounds... It will jump so fast and so high that the motor is probably already hurt before you notice, unless you're spinning the wee out of small chargers that won't go stupid if left to their own devices.

If you don't have an electronic boost control, which is likely, then simply set the spring soft enough that with no lines connected to the gate the truck will undershoot your desired boost a bit. Then run regulated air to the top port and simply vent the bottom port to hit your target boost. This way it is failSAFE, in that a blown line means the truck lays over and boost returns to the sub-par number you set on spring only... The downside being that it will be a bit softer on shifts to hit back to desired boost. But not by much.


Words from someone who's lifted heads with a blown signal line as configured in a way that relied on a full manifold signal to the bottom port.


On Edit:

Besides... the damn things are much easier to assemble without all the cock diesel springs in them...

Thanks for the response lots of knowledge sir

Remember u from the PSN days

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk
 
Joined
Oct 1, 2012
Messages
5,868
Reaction score
0
Location
Athens, IL
9esybu8a.jpg
I just got done doing one of these for a guy.
 

B585Ford

New member
Joined
Mar 17, 2012
Messages
2,730
Reaction score
0
Location
WV
In regards to the regulated boost, does the regulator just provide a certain percentage of total boost which is always the same percentage regardless of the total boost coming in (ie is the boost coming out of the regulator directly proportional to the boost coming in)?

Another question, would his work? Install a heavy spring into the gate that is rated for whatever the desired max EBP is and don't run any type of boost to either port?
 
Joined
Oct 1, 2012
Messages
5,868
Reaction score
0
Location
Athens, IL
In regards to the regulated boost, does the regulator just provide a certain percentage of total boost which is always the same percentage regardless of the total boost coming in (ie is the boost coming out of the regulator directly proportional to the boost coming in)?



Another question, would his work? Install a heavy spring into the gate that is rated for whatever the desired max EBP is and don't run any type of boost to either port?


Yes you can run it directly off spring pressure. It's more consistent. All the boost and regulator does is allow for adjustability without spring changes.
 

Jonnydime

Active member
Joined
Jun 26, 2012
Messages
2,319
Reaction score
8
Correct me of I'm wrong but I would think the only time you need boost pressure to help open the gate is when gating inbetween stages. In that scenario you have pressure you are trying to relieve into an already pressurized area. With the small drive pressure differential using boost to keep the gate open as the drive pressure evens out would be beneficial right?
 
Joined
Oct 1, 2012
Messages
5,868
Reaction score
0
Location
Athens, IL
Correct me of I'm wrong but I would think the only time you need boost pressure to help open the gate is when gating inbetween stages. In that scenario you have pressure you are trying to relieve into an already pressurized area. With the small drive pressure differential using boost to keep the gate open as the drive pressure evens out would be beneficial right?


Ideally where is how it works.

For starts let's say you want a max of 60ebp.

Scenario 1: you put the exact amount of springs to when the gate opens mechanically once 60 psi is reached.
(Perfect situation, except no adjustability without changing springs)

Scenario 2: you have too much spring and is makes 80 ebp and then you add boost pressure to help unload the spring pressure and open the gate. Unfortunately once the boost creeps up the more the gate opens and them then the less boost a ebp it makes. So them you add regulated boost back in the top to dial in and counteract some of the boost that's now opening it too soon. You tune it till you are able to repeatably reach 60ebp that you want.
(Most complicated and problematic)

Scenario 3: you have enough spring to where it will make 40 ebp. Then you add regulated boost to the top to hold the gate closed longer. Dial it in till it reaches 60 ebp that you desire. (The most desirable IMO)

With scenario 3 you can adjust ebp and if the adjustment fails it will stall make 40 ebp as a failsafe. Plus it is rock solid perfect every time. No fluctuation as you get with scenario 2 using two boost sources.
 

B585Ford

New member
Joined
Mar 17, 2012
Messages
2,730
Reaction score
0
Location
WV
Ideally where is how it works.

For starts let's say you want a max of 60ebp.

Scenario 1: you put the exact amount of springs to when the gate opens mechanically once 60 psi is reached.
(Perfect situation, except no adjustability without changing springs)

Scenario 2: you have too much spring and is makes 80 ebp and then you add boost pressure to help unload the spring pressure and open the gate. Unfortunately once the boost creeps up the more the gate opens and them then the less boost a ebp it makes. So them you add regulated boost back in the top to dial in and counteract some of the boost that's now opening it too soon. You tune it till you are able to repeatably reach 60ebp that you want.
(Most complicated and problematic)

Scenario 3: you have enough spring to where it will make 40 ebp. Then you add regulated boost to the top to hold the gate closed longer. Dial it in till it reaches 60 ebp that you desire. (The most desirable IMO)

With scenario 3 you can adjust ebp and if the adjustment fails it will stall make 40 ebp as a failsafe. Plus it is rock solid perfect every time. No fluctuation as you get with scenario 2 using two boost sources.

I think you just answered my previous question which I didn't word the best. The regulator always puts out the same PSI (no matter how much PSI is coming in to it)? If that is the case and the regulator puts out the same PSI all the time, that makes perfect sense to me (finally) why Senerio 3 would be the best option. Consistent opening pressure based on EBP with adjustability without removing springs.
 
Joined
Oct 1, 2012
Messages
5,868
Reaction score
0
Location
Athens, IL
I think you just answered my previous question which I didn't word the best. The regulator always puts out the same PSI (no matter how much PSI is coming in to it)? If that is the case and the regulator puts out the same PSI all the time, that makes perfect sense to me (finally) why Senerio 3 would be the best option. Consistent opening pressure based on EBP with adjustability without removing springs.


Regulator only puts our what you set it at. If you regulate to 25psi it doesn't matter it you make 30 or 50 it's will only put out 25. If it is less than 25 input it will make less than 25 out put.
 

silverpsd_06

New member
Joined
May 26, 2011
Messages
926
Reaction score
0
Location
Wellsville KS
Charles lives?? It's been quite awhile since I've seen you post. How is the truck doing or do you have other projects going on?
 

B585Ford

New member
Joined
Mar 17, 2012
Messages
2,730
Reaction score
0
Location
WV
Regulator only puts our what you set it at. If you regulate to 25psi it doesn't matter it you make 30 or 50 it's will only put out 25. If it is less than 25 input it will make less than 25 out put.

Thanks Morgan. I appreciate your explanation and this makes perfect sense to me. Senerio 3 it is.
 

Latest posts

Members online

Top