Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="jdc753, post: 757484, member: 52"] No... just no, size of the sub does not dictate clarity, that is a old wives tale, or may have applied years ago. Yes the cone is heavier and moving more air so by physics it does seem plausible, but in the proper box and proper power it isn't truth. Especially for the JL shallow 13". Those goes along the same lines as a sealed box is for sound quality and a ported box is for SPL competition. Key to tighter sound is the box, a smaller box acts as a tighter spring on the woofer increasing power handling (to over come that spring) and decreasing low end output. Conversely a large box will improve low end response as it is a "loose spring" and increase overall output but decrease power handling. I believe the closest spec to be looked into for a sub to be "muddy" is the Le which I believe is a measure of the subs transient response or motor strength (I forget) But the JL shallow really is a top notch sub just a tad pricey, but if the budget is good for you then it really is a top notch option to squeeze bass into these tight trucks. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Random media

dukes

AA7FB336-D322-4DD9-8017-CB9D2134FC8B

Misc_037

iphone_pics_277

ms2

eleanor_part_two_49_

394483_3746879346581_522765039_n

293941_214215245304283_100001474272705_597994_1362671332_n

261

HPP_2006_Polaris_900_RMK_159

connector

Latest posts

Truck slipping into 4th
- Latest: Sterling6.7
- Today at 7:18 PM
6.7 Tech
Do not recommend Choate Engineering
- Latest: DEEZUZ
- Wednesday at 10:22 PM
Newly Enlisted
A few turbo questions and a rant
- Latest: ghohouston
- Wednesday at 9:41 PM
7.3 Aftermarket
O
2011-2016 Radiator upgrade
- Latest: OtisCreekConstruction
- Wednesday at 6:17 PM
6.7 Tech
Performance shops
- Latest: DEEZUZ
- Tuesday at 8:42 AM
7.3 Performance

Members online

Total: 652 (members: 2, guests: 650)

Top