Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Powerstroke Cowboy, post: 989460, member: 610"] Yea I remember those quotes. I wonder where he placed all together?? He did not do as good as I hoped he would. I knew he could not win it. Just hoped he would place better. The Fords really did not do that great this year all around. 400/200 is not the problem imho. With compounds and NOS, He should have been a lot better then he was. I do not care if he was @ 6000 foot. With 400/200 and NOS he should have been a easy 700 plus. NOS is a game changer. Elevation does not affect it that much or at-least should not. I get a laugh at the guys that dyno at high elevation with boat loads of NOS, and make lets say 850 hp. Then add the correction factor in there and say it would be 1050 or 1100 at sea level. hmmm maybe fuel only I could see it but with NOS, Forget it! again number are just to have numbers. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Random media

vgt turbo functions

543119_3223576528697_812827396_n-2

IMAG1065

Picture_734

duals2

1996 F250 460

IMG00276-20120116-1005

Link Design

Latest posts

Won’t start
- Latest: psduser1
- Wednesday at 11:33 AM
7.3 Tech & FAQ
GT37 Turbocharger w/10 blade turbine, billet comp.
- Latest: hskfab
- Jun 6, 2025
Engine and Drivetrain
Hard steer question/issue
- Latest: psduser1
- Jun 5, 2025
7.3 Tech
B
WTS/WIF light flash and stall issue
- Latest: blickcd
- Jun 5, 2025
6.0 Tech
T
2013+ steering gearbox in older trucks
- Latest: TPOLO
- Jun 4, 2025
Suspension, Drive Train, and Tires

Members online

No members online now.

Total: 340 (members: 0, guests: 340)

Top