Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
New showcase items
New showcase comments
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Showcase
New items
New comments
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest updates
Search showcase
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Power Strokes
7.3 Aftermarket
AirDog failure
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="TARM, post: 424791, member: 578"] I think you totally missed the point. If you looked I wrote that it would not surprise me if some people choose to do the sumps now more then they use to because of the option to not having to drop the tank to do it. The comment was a playful jab. What is bad about a sump; nothing other than what I wrote. What is so great about a draw tube 5/8 or otherwise; same deal. If you actually read what I posted and the other posts in the thread..... Many were speaking of how the sumps were basically far superior to the draw tube. That draw tubes by design were restrictive compared to sumps of same size. I was putting forth the data to show that as you have just repeated that there is next to no difference between a sump and a siphon when it comes to flow rates. But as far as sumps go they cost 3x the cost of a PU. You are cutting a hole into the bottom of your tank. You now have fuel lines and fittings hanging down low where they could be caught on something. Some people do not have mall crawlers. Dumping 40 gals of diesel onto a road can tend to get you in some trouble. While its not illegal to have a sump they sure can charge you for the costs of clean up and that is not cheap. It was mentioned the benefit of a sump was that it took away the issue of low fuel tank level issues with air being sucked up the PU tube. I was pointing out how that could be dealt with quite easily. Not to mention the fact that we take away the factory device that prevent the issue from happening in the first place by supposedly upgrading the PU as I mentioned above as well. You think hooking up two hoses that are already run to the other ports on a filter base that is going to already be there is overcomplicated? Cause by doing so as long as your using a filter with enough flow capacity would completely solve any issues people are having with low tank issues if its from fuel slosh uncovering the PU inlet. If you find that to complicated that is your right. I think its seems quite simple. But then I like to have things done the best I can make them not just good enough. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Random media
Latest posts
D
Turning off the Auxiliary powertrain control module
Latest: donaldtfreeman
Today at 10:43 AM
6.0 Tech & FAQ
4r100 P0715/P0717 trouble codes.
Latest: Tiha
Today at 8:07 AM
7.3 Tech & FAQ
I must be getting old… Exhaust is too loud
Latest: ju015dd
Sunday at 7:59 AM
6.0 Aftermarket
2000 f350 dually lariat
Latest: Powerstroke Cowboy
Saturday at 8:30 PM
7.3 Aftermarket
T
B&W hitch and shock removal
Latest: TexMac
Wednesday at 2:48 PM
2017+ 6.7 Aluminum Super Duty
Members online
No members online now.
Forums
Power Strokes
7.3 Aftermarket
AirDog failure
Top