Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Wayne, post: 445335, member: 863"] I will begin by saying I'm sorry... sorry that your ineptitude to comprehend the point of this thread has just about everyone involved wondering what the point of your involvement is.:pointlaugh: Your "data" is "THE RAN GOOD ON ONE TRUCK".:shrug: If this is your data, I suggest you keep your "helpful" information to topics such as 'the fastest way to choke down a ham sammich', or 'how to stand your own smell because you're allergic to deodorant'.:thumbup: If you want to contribute to this thread, go take a midol, do some actual tests validating performance gains of the manifolds, and come back with useful information, or keep your mouth shut. I am involved with this thread because I am the person who actually did the before & after datalogging of Mike's truck, as well as the actual install of the steed speed manifolds. I know first hand about the before and after results of the truck's performance. The turbos were undamaged at the time of the tests as Leen suggested, (I have no reason to believe they're damaged now) and the symptoms Mike described are accurate. I could also say "THE[B][SIZE="5"]Y[/SIZE][/B] RAN GOOD ON DILLEHAY'S TRUCK", and that would be an accurate statement, as yours is accurate (but pointless considering the topic if this thread) considering the debatability of the definition of 'good'. Do I want the steed speed manifolds to succeed? Sure I do. I'm confident that with a few changes, they'll be the best choice available. Time, and actual validation tests performed by compitent shops will verify results. We'll leave the "THE RAN GOOD ON ONE TRUCK":lame:, and "I just spend a ton of money, and they look cool, so they must work:stupid:" tests and data collection up to the window lickers, and hype promoters. [/QUOTE]