Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
New showcase items
New showcase comments
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Showcase
New items
New comments
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest updates
Search showcase
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Power Strokes
94-97 Aftermarket
B code v.s. Hybrid
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Charles, post: 100818, member: 103"] And It's still hilarious that Lott picks the Hybrid over the B because of increased hydraulic ratio.... yet does NOT pick the A over the B. And if in his mind he thinks that it's plunger rate of drop that's the problem here (it isn't), then between an A and a reverse hybrid, which does he pick? A hybrid and a B have identical plungers with one having a larger intensifier. He picks the one with the larger intensifier. So... seeing as an A and a reverse hybrid both have identical plungers and the only difference yet again is intensifier piston diameter.... does his brain still have him pick the one with the larger piston? The reverse hybrid? Lott? Do you think a reverse hybrid is going to achieve greater injection "quality" through increased injection pressure over a straight A-code? Anybody else think it's funny that Lott actually thinks the larger intensifier piston of a B-code actually equates to greater "muscle" as he puts it? When in fact, it's exactly that big ass intensifier that KILLS the muscle of the B due to insufficient ability to deliver rotella into that cavity at sufficient rate. The PROVEN result is a DECREASE in force driving the plunger downward. Which manifests itself as reduced injection pressure and reduced flow rate across a given nozzle. This sh*t's not up for grabs. Multiple people have conducted direct tests and found the same results. You simply can't get enough rotella across the poppet to support rate of volume expansion in a B-code intensifier piston bore. Drilling a million holes in the body UP TO this point doesn't change this. The only people that can't understand things like this are the ones too stupid to do back to back testing WITHOUT changing major things. Lott's idea of "testing" something is riding around in one truck running ___, ____, ____, ____, _____ and B-codes, then riding around in another truck running _____, _____, ______, _____, _____ and hybrids. Because his ass says the B's feel better, it must be so. And anyone that DIRECTLY tests the two injector types back to back at the SAME TIME in a device DIRECTLY measuring their output SIMULTANEOUSLY is the DEVIL!!! LOL F'ing B-codes. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Random media
Latest posts
02 F250 7.3 Will crank, WTS stays on, no start, no OBD
Latest: Sterling6.7
Sunday at 8:57 PM
7.3 Tech
P0087
Latest: DEEZUZ
Sunday at 11:49 AM
6.4 Tech & FAQ
2015-2019 6.7 HPFP New In Box
Latest: lincolnlocker
Jun 1, 2026
Engine and Drivetrain
First 6.0L (56k warning)
Latest: adrianspeeder
May 26, 2026
6.0 Tech
Extra external motor oil cooler?
Latest: justinlogue5_0
May 26, 2026
7.3 Tech
Members online
No members online now.
Forums
Power Strokes
94-97 Aftermarket
B code v.s. Hybrid
Top