Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="TARM, post: 1420612, member: 578"] I think the real changes are not some ultimate nozzle or capacity as we have been able to do that for some time. The issue is you can not move the oil fastest enough adn in the volume needed thus b&p ratios etc to put enough fuel in the shorter and shorter windows as rpms drive above the 3k range. Its what helps keep CR systems together with stock bottom ends at much higher HP. TO make the HP at lower RPMS thus less work being done for a given force applied ( tq) it much need more force i.e tq thus more cylinder pressure. If you can fuel into higher RPMS ( more work over time) you can use less force (tq) thus lower CP and get more work down ( horsepower) Thus consider keeping a stock bottom end were properly tuned equated to 1000ftlb tq cylinder pressure. The HP created at 2500RPM at that rate is far less than @ 3500 and so on up to the formula cross over point of 5250 rpm which is the upper limits of most any diesels. It sounds he has found a way to create flow and ratios that allow given oil to do more work in a given period and to flow more oil in and out thru more fuel is injected. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Random media

IMG00596-20110511-1723

2008 6.4L pic4

06 door wire harness

Swamps Timing 1

f350

eleanor_part_two_80_

IMAG1091

No limit intake

Stock_Fuel

Coolant_flow_close_up

Latest posts

Gauge cluster face plates
- Latest: crash86
- Yesterday at 5:15 PM
6.0 Aftermarket
B
6.4 head gasket job cost
- Latest: bowhunter
- Yesterday at 2:07 PM
6.4 Aftermarket
S
6R140 surging issue
- Latest: Smokin 6.0
- Yesterday at 12:11 AM
6.7 Tech & FAQ
Won’t start
- Latest: psduser1
- Wednesday at 11:33 AM
7.3 Tech & FAQ
GT37 Turbocharger w/10 blade turbine, billet comp.
- Latest: hskfab
- Jun 6, 2025
Engine and Drivetrain

Members online

No members online now.

Total: 226 (members: 0, guests: 226)

Top