Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
New showcase items
New showcase comments
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Showcase
New items
New comments
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest updates
Search showcase
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Power Strokes
7.3 Aftermarket
Common rail conversion using duramax parts
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="smokinstroker92, post: 1078007, member: 3595"] The cfm numbers are going to be entirely dependent on the flow bench that is being used and the calibration on said flow bench. The bench used to flow these 7.3 heads will flow about 210 cfms while fully ported 12v heads around 220-230 at .600 lift and the hamilton 12v big valve fully ported heads flow high 200s. I have seen variations of 40-50 cfms on the same head on other flow benches. At the same time with a 12v head having intake ports feeding 5.9l or displacement and the 7.3s having 8 intake ports feeding 7.3ls. Each 12v port feeds .983L of displacement while the 7.3 ports are feeding .913L of displacement. So for instance on the same bench we have a fully ported 12v head flowing 230 and the fully ported 7.3 head flowing 210. 7.3l: 210cfms*8ports= 1680cfms total flow/7.3l= 230.14cfm/L 5.9l: 230cfms*6ports= 1380cfms total flow/5.9l= 233.89cfm/L To me this shows that the efficiency of each head is pretty close to the same per displacement and the # of cylinders. Now would the 7.3l still be limited by a 2.6 charger? I could agree with that because the flow from a 2.6 charger is not enough to reach the peak of the potential for the larger displacement motor that a 3.0 or twins in a superstock application may have. Now i may be off here on my thinking here whats your thoughts? And why the decreased stroke? yes that would bring displacement back down but it would also decrease the time @ tdc which i would also agree is critical to overall engine efficiency [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Random media
Latest posts
T
B&W hitch and shock removal
Latest: TexMac
Wednesday at 2:48 PM
2017+ 6.7 Aluminum Super Duty
6
ISSUES WITH CHOATES WARRANTY
Latest: 6.7powersmoke
Wednesday at 2:12 PM
1999-2015 Superduty Series General
Truck slipping into 4th
Latest: Sterling6.7
Apr 25, 2025
6.7 Tech
Do not recommend Choate Engineering
Latest: DEEZUZ
Apr 23, 2025
Newly Enlisted
A few turbo questions and a rant
Latest: ghohouston
Apr 23, 2025
7.3 Aftermarket
Members online
No members online now.
Forums
Power Strokes
7.3 Aftermarket
Common rail conversion using duramax parts
Top