Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
New showcase items
New showcase comments
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Showcase
New items
New comments
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest updates
Search showcase
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Power Strokes
7.3 Aftermarket
Common rail conversion using duramax parts
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="smokinstroker92, post: 1078007, member: 3595"] The cfm numbers are going to be entirely dependent on the flow bench that is being used and the calibration on said flow bench. The bench used to flow these 7.3 heads will flow about 210 cfms while fully ported 12v heads around 220-230 at .600 lift and the hamilton 12v big valve fully ported heads flow high 200s. I have seen variations of 40-50 cfms on the same head on other flow benches. At the same time with a 12v head having intake ports feeding 5.9l or displacement and the 7.3s having 8 intake ports feeding 7.3ls. Each 12v port feeds .983L of displacement while the 7.3 ports are feeding .913L of displacement. So for instance on the same bench we have a fully ported 12v head flowing 230 and the fully ported 7.3 head flowing 210. 7.3l: 210cfms*8ports= 1680cfms total flow/7.3l= 230.14cfm/L 5.9l: 230cfms*6ports= 1380cfms total flow/5.9l= 233.89cfm/L To me this shows that the efficiency of each head is pretty close to the same per displacement and the # of cylinders. Now would the 7.3l still be limited by a 2.6 charger? I could agree with that because the flow from a 2.6 charger is not enough to reach the peak of the potential for the larger displacement motor that a 3.0 or twins in a superstock application may have. Now i may be off here on my thinking here whats your thoughts? And why the decreased stroke? yes that would bring displacement back down but it would also decrease the time @ tdc which i would also agree is critical to overall engine efficiency [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Random media
Latest posts
OEM LED sport headlights
Latest: ghohouston
Today at 8:37 AM
2017+ 6.7 Aluminum Super Duty
Gauge cluster face plates
Latest: crash86
Sunday at 5:15 PM
6.0 Aftermarket
B
6.4 head gasket job cost
Latest: bowhunter
Sunday at 2:07 PM
6.4 Aftermarket
S
6R140 surging issue
Latest: Smokin 6.0
Sunday at 12:11 AM
6.7 Tech & FAQ
Won’t start
Latest: psduser1
Wednesday at 11:33 AM
7.3 Tech & FAQ
Members online
projectford
Forums
Power Strokes
7.3 Aftermarket
Common rail conversion using duramax parts
Top