Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="smokinstroker92, post: 1078296, member: 3595"] Well that enlightens me on the benefits of a shorter stroke and makes sense and i would assume on a mechanical application the fueling rate would not be a problem Assuming you are still running standard or close to standard bore in your 6.4? The 7.3s still have a larger bore diameter to work with. When you say big bore how big are you talking? Would it not be sufficient to shorten the stroke on a 7.3 while leaving the bore alone? You would have all the benefits of shorter stroke while still retaining the larger bore. Shortening the stroke would not be to expensive; offset grind the crank with a longer rod. The stock 7.3 heads still have some gains to be had with bigger valves, machining the intake runners off and using different style intakes but all that could be changed with a billet head. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Random media

Rudi

EDGE Insight CTS - Cheap Insurance

epic4

25541_1278049154743_1335447039_30914493_29803_n

zQ_800

20180115_080935

denvertrip

F30B2F7D-C859-45F3-83D2-E27129023E60

577

Latest posts

Gauge cluster face plates
- Latest: crash86
- Yesterday at 5:15 PM
6.0 Aftermarket
B
6.4 head gasket job cost
- Latest: bowhunter
- Yesterday at 2:07 PM
6.4 Aftermarket
S
6R140 surging issue
- Latest: Smokin 6.0
- Yesterday at 12:11 AM
6.7 Tech & FAQ
Won’t start
- Latest: psduser1
- Wednesday at 11:33 AM
7.3 Tech & FAQ
GT37 Turbocharger w/10 blade turbine, billet comp.
- Latest: hskfab
- Jun 6, 2025
Engine and Drivetrain

Members online

No members online now.

Total: 185 (members: 0, guests: 185)

Top