Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="CurtisF, post: 1406182, member: 829"] No one has argued what you just posted. What has been argued is to what DEGREE these advantages and disadvantages have an effect on the overall performance, emissions, etc. That's what superpsd was getting at in the statement that you quoted. The thing is that this is a rhetorical argument that will go round and round with no answer. Why? The problem is that two things are not standardized: tuning and injector build quality. Those two variances will have a far greater effect than the issue at hand - atomization between smaller and larger nozzles. Heck even the same tuner might have smaller nozzles nailed down, but suck at tuning larger nozzles (or vice versa). So what you propose on the dyno is an impossible task to begin with because it will NEVER be equally tested. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Random media

2012-10-31_18-15-34_882

All nice a purty

5721

IMG_20140317_120836_210

11050736_10153176647948050_1365818109064228304_n

Sandy Hook never forget

16Lariat2

44485_1268371769888_1847662944_530825_6233400_n

IMAG0454

6_0_engine_bay_3

Latest posts

02 F250 7.3 Will crank, WTS stays on, no start, no OBD
- Latest: Sterling6.7
- Sunday at 8:57 PM
7.3 Tech
P0087
- Latest: DEEZUZ
- Sunday at 11:49 AM
6.4 Tech & FAQ
2015-2019 6.7 HPFP New In Box
- Latest: lincolnlocker
- Jun 1, 2026
Engine and Drivetrain
First 6.0L (56k warning)
- Latest: adrianspeeder
- May 26, 2026
6.0 Tech
Extra external motor oil cooler?
- Latest: justinlogue5_0
- May 26, 2026
7.3 Tech

Members online

No members online now.

Total: 466 (members: 0, guests: 466)

Top