Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
New showcase items
New showcase comments
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Showcase
New items
New comments
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest updates
Search showcase
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Power Strokes
7.3 Aftermarket
Doing it Gangsta
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Big Bore, post: 116170, member: 760"] I'm not misunderstanding the principle at all. I'm fully aware that the point load is either magnified or reduced based on the area of the load. In this instance, I would venture the area of pressure of the spring and that being affected by the boost is almost equal. The spring exerts pressure in an area the diameter of the spring. Boost exerts pressure on the backside of the valve, however only part of that pressure is in direct opposition to the spring, since the valve curves and the directional forces of the boost will be reduced as the surface becomes closer to perpendicular to the valve face, and, the area of the diameter of the valve stem is not being acted upon by the boost at all. The area of pressure from boost is not the area of the valve face, it will be less than that. If I were to hazard a guess it would start exerting pressure in opposition to the spring somewhere around 45*, but that will be significantly reduced, so it's probably almost equal to the area of the spring pressure being exerted in opposition, possibly even less, which in turn makes the higher pressure spring even more overkill. Heres the thing, there may in fact be a boost and performance level where this spring might be applicable. I doubt many on this site are at that level. And it would be at a cost of extremely increased wear on all valve train parts, and those parts would need to be a lot stronger, i.e. solid roller lifters and roller rockers. IOW not even remotely practical for a daily driver. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Random media
Latest posts
10R140 failure
Latest: PSD-BLACK-CLOUD
Friday at 1:04 PM
2017+ 6.7 Aluminum Super Duty
2010 headunit
Latest: glog
Wednesday at 1:17 PM
6.4 Tech
D
Turning off the Auxiliary powertrain control module
Latest: donaldtfreeman
Tuesday at 10:43 AM
6.0 Tech & FAQ
4r100 P0715/P0717 trouble codes.
Latest: Tiha
Tuesday at 8:07 AM
7.3 Tech & FAQ
I must be getting old… Exhaust is too loud
Latest: ju015dd
May 4, 2025
6.0 Aftermarket
Members online
fastersteve
Patrick Feeley
Forums
Power Strokes
7.3 Aftermarket
Doing it Gangsta
Top