Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Power Hungry, post: 314853, member: 1375"] Our elevation is about 800 Ft. I didn't notice any difference in lag/spool between the housings while running loaded on the dyno. Truck feels very responsive with both housings and the dyno didn't show a significant loss with the 1.15 housing, so I'd say you could go either way. My biggest thing between the housing was that the cost factor seemed to outweigh any perceived EGT/Backpressure benefits of the looser housing. The 1.0 housing runs fine at this point with no surging as of yet. Now, I have not put a trailer on the back or anything like that so I can't say 100% that there isn't any surge with the 1.0 housing, but I'll wait until we get the new tranny installed before I proceed any further since the tranny and converter is going change the loading on the engine. We'll fine tune after that and if it is deemed necessary we'll change back to the 1.15 housing. At this point, I don't see the need to. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Random media

2012-08-07_23-24-28_117

Dual IPRs

Fork_gap

200

IMAG1459

first_f350

2008 6.4L pic7

IMG_20130404_212913_904

2008 6.4L pic2

IMAG0826

20140325_095206

193474_196574997029461_100000308874737_610002_1926299_o1

Latest posts

S
2018 f350 dually advance trac and hill descent unavailable ?
- Latest: Smokin 6.0
- Today at 6:42 PM
6.7 Tech & FAQ
S
6R140 surging issue
- Latest: Smokin 6.0
- Today at 6:40 PM
6.7 Tech & FAQ
B
PMF Traction Bars - Fixed vs Floating
- Latest: Benson1025
- Today at 11:34 AM
Suspension, Drive Train, and Tires
2000 f350 dually lariat
- Latest: ju015dd
- Yesterday at 9:10 PM
7.3 Aftermarket
new build input welcomed
- Latest: btoler4th
- Yesterday at 3:37 PM
6.4 Aftermarket

Members online

No members online now.

Total: 320 (members: 0, guests: 320)

Top