Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Power Hungry, post: 314853, member: 1375"] Our elevation is about 800 Ft. I didn't notice any difference in lag/spool between the housings while running loaded on the dyno. Truck feels very responsive with both housings and the dyno didn't show a significant loss with the 1.15 housing, so I'd say you could go either way. My biggest thing between the housing was that the cost factor seemed to outweigh any perceived EGT/Backpressure benefits of the looser housing. The 1.0 housing runs fine at this point with no surging as of yet. Now, I have not put a trailer on the back or anything like that so I can't say 100% that there isn't any surge with the 1.0 housing, but I'll wait until we get the new tranny installed before I proceed any further since the tranny and converter is going change the loading on the engine. We'll fine tune after that and if it is deemed necessary we'll change back to the 1.15 housing. At this point, I don't see the need to. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Random media

Fg_800

rear_link1

photo_36_

25634_1295950922276_1335447039_30951808_1247213_n

sam_and_her_truck

250092_166852970045031_100001609875209_422853_654246_n1

Duramax hauling grain truck

Fw_800

New Name Plates

Latest posts

2000 f350 dually lariat
- Latest: ju015dd
- Today at 9:10 PM
7.3 Aftermarket
new build input welcomed
- Latest: btoler4th
- Today at 3:37 PM
6.4 Aftermarket
OEM LED sport headlights
- Latest: ghohouston
- Today at 8:37 AM
2017+ 6.7 Aluminum Super Duty
Gauge cluster face plates
- Latest: crash86
- Sunday at 5:15 PM
6.0 Aftermarket
B
6.4 head gasket job cost
- Latest: bowhunter
- Sunday at 2:07 PM
6.4 Aftermarket

Members online

No members online now.

Total: 247 (members: 0, guests: 247)

Top