Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
New showcase items
New showcase comments
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Showcase
New items
New comments
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest updates
Search showcase
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Power Strokes
6.0 Aftermarket
Independent Injector Comparison
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Power Hungry, post: 262660, member: 1375"] There is definitely a balance between injector volume, flow rate, and tuning limitations. The larger the volume of the injector, the larger the nozzle size required to empty the injector in the allotted time available. In this respect, it's not at all different than the 7.3L. The advantage that a 6.0L has is that the FICM controls all aspects of the injection pulsewidth and the injectors fire much quicker than a 7.3L and at a higher pressure, so it is much easier to completely evacuate an injector at narrower pulsewidth. This is why 135cc injectors make well over 400 HP on a tuned 6.0L while the 7.3L makes a measly 320-330 HP on 135cc. So it comes down to... What is the SMALLEST nozzle size you can run that will still allow you to completely evacuate the injector? At one point, injection companies were offer flow charts for their injectors which included test pressures and flow rates at specific pulsewidths. For example: 160cc/Stock Nozzles: [SIZE="1"](click on image to enlarge)[/SIZE] [URL="http://www.phptune.com/images/injector_flow_chart/160_0.jpg"][IMG]http://www.phptune.com/images/injector_flow_chart/160_0_sm.jpg[/IMG][/URL] 238cc/80% Nozzles: [SIZE="1"](click on image to enlarge)[/SIZE] [URL="http://www.phptune.com/images/injector_flow_chart/238_80.jpg"][IMG]http://www.phptune.com/images/injector_flow_chart/238_80_sm.jpg[/IMG][/URL] 400cc/200% Nozzles: [SIZE="1"](click on image to enlarge)[/SIZE] [URL="http://www.phptune.com/images/injector_flow_chart/400_200.jpg"][IMG]http://www.phptune.com/images/injector_flow_chart/400_200_sm.jpg[/IMG][/URL] 455cc/460% Nozzles: [SIZE="1"](click on image to enlarge)[/SIZE] [URL="http://www.phptune.com/images/injector_flow_chart/455_460.jpg"][IMG]http://www.phptune.com/images/injector_flow_chart/455_460_sm.jpg[/IMG][/URL] If we had charts like these on the 6.0L injectors, it would really be helpful not only for the tuner, but for the customers as well. This way everyone can make an educated decision on injector selection. It's good that this is being brought up, because it really helps to show how injector sizing and tuning go hand-in-hand. :clapping: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Random media
Latest posts
Truck slipping into 4th
Latest: Sterling6.7
Friday at 7:18 PM
6.7 Tech
Do not recommend Choate Engineering
Latest: DEEZUZ
Apr 23, 2025
Newly Enlisted
A few turbo questions and a rant
Latest: ghohouston
Apr 23, 2025
7.3 Aftermarket
O
2011-2016 Radiator upgrade
Latest: OtisCreekConstruction
Apr 23, 2025
6.7 Tech
Performance shops
Latest: DEEZUZ
Apr 22, 2025
7.3 Performance
Members online
No members online now.
Forums
Power Strokes
6.0 Aftermarket
Independent Injector Comparison
Top