Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Charles, post: 566828, member: 103"] What you describe above would only be valid if you had been injecting the same amount of fuel from each nozzle. Even then, a 200 is actually more efficient than a 400 purely in construction. The actual rate of each nozzle had little if anything to do with your result. The reality is, with equally produced nozzles, the smaller the charger, the faster the fuel must go in to make the same power given the air deficiency. This is precisely why nitrous oxide works so well with smallish nozzles. It chemically advances the burn rate to make up for the retarded injection rate. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Random media

rear_axle_2_

110

he451ve compressor exducer

track

OEM_Cooler

Minotaur Parameters

08 thumper

Misc_039

IMG_20140510_185714_613

Latest posts

2000 f350 dually lariat
- Latest: ju015dd
- Yesterday at 9:10 PM
7.3 Aftermarket
new build input welcomed
- Latest: btoler4th
- Yesterday at 3:37 PM
6.4 Aftermarket
OEM LED sport headlights
- Latest: ghohouston
- Yesterday at 8:37 AM
2017+ 6.7 Aluminum Super Duty
Gauge cluster face plates
- Latest: crash86
- Sunday at 5:15 PM
6.0 Aftermarket
B
6.4 head gasket job cost
- Latest: bowhunter
- Sunday at 2:07 PM
6.4 Aftermarket

Members online

No members online now.

Total: 474 (members: 0, guests: 474)

Top