Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="C'roy78stroker, post: 1513373, member: 2884"] I'll be looking into this in case anyone was remotely interested in the original idea. If the stock crank rod journals can be destroked .250, a longer custom rod would be built, combine that with a .010 overbore, displacement would come out to a 6.9L ironically. I also ran numbers on the rod/stroke ratio (1.88) and bore/stroke ratio (1.04) with the altered setup. If the general ratio rules of thumb apply to any internal combustion engine then these numbers make it seem plausible. Plus with a longer rod, there would be more dwell time for the Piston near TDC which would also aid in the fuel injection window problem that we start to face with large fuel at higher rpm's. I'd like to get input about whether or not these calculations could be applied to diesel short block assemblies or not. Seems to me that rod ratio was a reason 6.7 Cummins crowd we're destroking down 6.4 liters. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Random media

photo_3_2_

photo_43

13_emblem

Bushwacker "Extend-A-Fender" flares

SSBC Brakes

IMG_20140210_132957_819

diamond eye exhaust 5

IMAG0046

srt3

Latest posts

Truck slipping into 4th
- Latest: Sterling6.7
- Yesterday at 7:18 PM
6.7 Tech
Do not recommend Choate Engineering
- Latest: DEEZUZ
- Wednesday at 10:22 PM
Newly Enlisted
A few turbo questions and a rant
- Latest: ghohouston
- Wednesday at 9:41 PM
7.3 Aftermarket
O
2011-2016 Radiator upgrade
- Latest: OtisCreekConstruction
- Wednesday at 6:17 PM
6.7 Tech
Performance shops
- Latest: DEEZUZ
- Tuesday at 8:42 AM
7.3 Performance

Members online

No members online now.

Total: 846 (members: 0, guests: 846)

Top