Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="TARM, post: 353470, member: 578"] I think I may not have made my position very clear the way I wrote that. I agree with what you are saying and I do not think its in direct conflict with what I was "trying" to communicate in my post. It was in response to the topic Maddiesel73, V-ref, and Charles were discussing. What I was trying to say was that I agreed with Charles in that going with the smaller nozzle (100%) was the wrong way to go about it but that I did think you could get there using the volume of fuel that a 100% could flow in 3 ms just in a larger nozzle thus a much shorter PW thus gaining RPMs. 215cc is about what my 200% can do in a ms less i.e. 2ms. Not sure what it could do with some of the well tuned 400% 1.5-1.7ms range? [/QUOTE]

Verification

Random media

2011-11-09_18-18-49_469

PS pump replacment

0011

New set of gpz's

Venturi

eleanor_part_two_30_

befor an after

'07 5.9 Cummins

PHP Timing map 1

20171227_153114

screenshot_1_

Latest posts

02 F250 7.3 Will crank, WTS stays on, no start, no OBD
- Latest: Sterling6.7
- Sunday at 8:57 PM
7.3 Tech
P0087
- Latest: DEEZUZ
- Sunday at 11:49 AM
6.4 Tech & FAQ
2015-2019 6.7 HPFP New In Box
- Latest: lincolnlocker
- Jun 1, 2026
Engine and Drivetrain
First 6.0L (56k warning)
- Latest: adrianspeeder
- May 26, 2026
6.0 Tech
Extra external motor oil cooler?
- Latest: justinlogue5_0
- May 26, 2026
7.3 Tech

Members online

No members online now.

Total: 4,559 (members: 0, guests: 4,559)

Top