Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="golfer, post: 608291, member: 266"] zero offense taken, and I absolutely didn't construe this as stirring the pot... the problem I have...is this: this is what we saw..every. single. time. the injectors came back. so, hopefully you can see how frustrated WE were, again..not at you...but at your 'mechanics' insistence that the injectors were installed properly. last time I checked...carbon is pretty hard chit...and when you get carbon INSIDE the injector (fuel side)..it may not really play well with the ridiculously tight tolerances within the plunger & barrel assemblies...which rely explicitly on fuel LUBRICITY to maintain proper function. 6.0L injectors are unreliable..'reman' 6.0L injectors (with used spool valves) are a joke...so when our customers buy (literally) the best injector..and the install is jacked up repeatedly...all YOU (the customer) knows is that the damn truck isn't running...and you paid x thousand dollars for the 'same ol' chit' from your truck... I, honestly HATE how this situation turned out...our business was founded on fuel injectors...and the 6.0L injectors bit us in the ass for a couple of years before we went to the Motorcraft injectors with new spool valves.. hell..any monkey can swap nozzles and do machine work to the internals...but trying to rebuild a used 6.0L injector...is not a viable option for someone wanting to keep the truck. The way the spool valve functions is exactly like a piston in a cyl bore...and once those clearances/tolerances are lost...you CAN'T rebuild that part of the injector. It would be like trying to rebuild a worn out engine without having 010, 020, 030 over pistons...period. no matter how diligent the machine work is...no matter what care & precautions were maintained during the rebuild process...if the spool is loose in its' bore...you will have problems with the spool valves hanging and sticking. Ford Motorcraft injectors are the only injectors with NEW spool valves...and that is the only injector we will build from, sell or install. I didn't mind your criticism...but I absolutely couldn't let your first post just sit there undefended, when...in my mind...you were not dealing with an 'injector' problem...but rather an [I]installer [/I]problem. and until someone can explain how an "injector problem" can account for the picture I attached, and not an install problem..I'll stand by our product. [/QUOTE]