Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Charles, post: 34744, member: 103"] The 200's were notably more crisp. And I don't know where you will find a "300" as mine were 200's that were sent to Jim at EH and made into 300's. I actually intended for 400's right then and there, but through some confusion over % [b]of[/b] vs %[b]over[/b] I ended up with 300's. If I were you, I would run the 200 and see if you can break 600, and/or if it feels good to you. If not... you can always do a nozzle swap later. The 200 is just such a crisp nozzle. Then again.... the 300's were a [i]lot[/i] more fun, lol. Fwiw, I don't think the tuners need to up their game so-to-speak. My point was that the general consensus needs to change. I expect the tuners can do whatever they need to do in terms of skill, I just don't think people are allowing it to happen because of the mentality that a bigger nozzle means more smoke.... when it doesn't. In fact, power per power it often means less. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Random media

919123_367663446688562_990954678_o

my stufff

ADcarbon1

Version 1

6_7_EGRDEL

2011-12-03_17-35-42_14

Tube_Tool

crowfoot_wrench_1

20180408_150031

20180808_160558

Latest posts

02 F250 7.3 Will crank, WTS stays on, no start, no OBD
- Latest: Sterling6.7
- Sunday at 8:57 PM
7.3 Tech
P0087
- Latest: DEEZUZ
- Sunday at 11:49 AM
6.4 Tech & FAQ
2015-2019 6.7 HPFP New In Box
- Latest: lincolnlocker
- Jun 1, 2026
Engine and Drivetrain
First 6.0L (56k warning)
- Latest: adrianspeeder
- May 26, 2026
6.0 Tech
Extra external motor oil cooler?
- Latest: justinlogue5_0
- May 26, 2026
7.3 Tech

Members online

No members online now.

Total: 6,737 (members: 0, guests: 6,737)

Top