Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
New showcase items
New showcase comments
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Showcase
New items
New comments
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest updates
Search showcase
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Power Strokes
7.3 Aftermarket
Tuning 101 - Thread Merged with Injector Posts
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Charles, post: 1317532, member: 103"] That's the whole point. It's a proof. Instead of everybody working on the task in their own dark cave somewhere. Excuse the ICP table.... I literally ran the values straight over and sliced a ravine in it for idle. As I said, I haven't made love to this file yet, I basically just ran down the road and it was surprisingly good, plus I haven't had much time to do much. Aside from that, and a disparity in ICP running up to ~3200 ish on the top on the scanner, even though I have 3000 in the map, I don't know any better as to what's messed up. But I sure will appreciate the criticism. How can you reliably run my program on a non Txxxxx whatever pcm? Sounds like a cut and paste nightmare. How can you be sure it will run the same? I have suuuuuuuper low sucess doing this. Always some kind of parameter or function in the background totally altering something in a different way. I'm not concerned in terms of "if you like the program or not", you can see that by looking at it in the proper template anyway. I ask more as a question of how in the hell you could reliably flop a program from one template to another like that. Fwiw.... if your truck is an auto, and you did get the program I posted to come over as it drives in my truck, I think you just might like it. Unless of course, the thing with the crazy slow injectors you spoke of ruins it for you. Regardless, I'm curious to see what your thoughts are. Or those of anyone who's pulled it up. Lastly.... I had no idea we were both cruising around in basically stock trucks with 200 nozzles... I swapped the turbo because the late model superduty turbo is junk and the 38R was laying on my floor. And I wouldn't recommend a 200 for a grocery getter. That's why [i]my[/i] grocery getter is a bone stock excursion that my wife drives! I have advocated that the 200 EDM takes over at around 300hp. I however wouldn't be surprised if when AT full power, the nozzle weren't actually already more efficient than stock at even sub 300rwhp. It's then more a case of usage. If the truck's hooked to 16,000lbs all the time, the 200 wins because you're going to be deep in desired power all the time. If the truck runs around empty, then the stock nozzle would win because desired power would probably be in the 80hp range or something most of the time where the 200 EDM is probably less efficient. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Random media
Latest posts
02 F250 7.3 Will crank, WTS stays on, no start, no OBD
Latest: Sterling6.7
Sunday at 8:57 PM
7.3 Tech
P0087
Latest: DEEZUZ
Sunday at 11:49 AM
6.4 Tech & FAQ
2015-2019 6.7 HPFP New In Box
Latest: lincolnlocker
Jun 1, 2026
Engine and Drivetrain
First 6.0L (56k warning)
Latest: adrianspeeder
May 26, 2026
6.0 Tech
Extra external motor oil cooler?
Latest: justinlogue5_0
May 26, 2026
7.3 Tech
Members online
No members online now.
Forums
Power Strokes
7.3 Aftermarket
Tuning 101 - Thread Merged with Injector Posts
Top