Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="uncool, post: 1365731, member: 1802"] "I wish I could rewrite the function that relates boost to MFD so that it relates boost to PW... Would be SOOOOO easy to control fueling without neudering ICP! We need ICP.... it's PW we can't have too much of at low boost!" I am not a tuner, nor do I have software yet, just thinking out loud. So I have been thinking about this for a bit with my trans tuning with PCS. In essence, we run a 2 bar map sensor that has some limited range, IE, ~18 psi = full fuel that the PCM commands or looks for. ~24 psi = check engine light for over boost. So as the PCM sees 18 psi, it says yahoo I have full fuel, I don't care what you throttle position/ICP/MFD and so on is. Just because your boost gauge goes to 50 PSI, you PCM doesn't care. So, would it be an advantage to us to use a different MAP sensor that made better use of the 0 - 5 V signal that the PCM sees? More linear fuel delivery and smoother. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Random media

Beauty_Beast

IMAG1026

bigger_97_f250

1030121042

13_hid

eleanor_part_two_39_

original_eleanor_1_

3E93If3N15L35N25F6d2ia9d9198b3f401a14

Vac Line 2

My Baby :)

Latest posts

02 F250 7.3 Will crank, WTS stays on, no start, no OBD
- Latest: Sterling6.7
- Sunday at 8:57 PM
7.3 Tech
P0087
- Latest: DEEZUZ
- Sunday at 11:49 AM
6.4 Tech & FAQ
2015-2019 6.7 HPFP New In Box
- Latest: lincolnlocker
- Jun 1, 2026
Engine and Drivetrain
First 6.0L (56k warning)
- Latest: adrianspeeder
- May 26, 2026
6.0 Tech
Extra external motor oil cooler?
- Latest: justinlogue5_0
- May 26, 2026
7.3 Tech

Members online

No members online now.

Total: 628 (members: 0, guests: 628)

Top