Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="uncool, post: 1365731, member: 1802"] "I wish I could rewrite the function that relates boost to MFD so that it relates boost to PW... Would be SOOOOO easy to control fueling without neudering ICP! We need ICP.... it's PW we can't have too much of at low boost!" I am not a tuner, nor do I have software yet, just thinking out loud. So I have been thinking about this for a bit with my trans tuning with PCS. In essence, we run a 2 bar map sensor that has some limited range, IE, ~18 psi = full fuel that the PCM commands or looks for. ~24 psi = check engine light for over boost. So as the PCM sees 18 psi, it says yahoo I have full fuel, I don't care what you throttle position/ICP/MFD and so on is. Just because your boost gauge goes to 50 PSI, you PCM doesn't care. So, would it be an advantage to us to use a different MAP sensor that made better use of the 0 - 5 V signal that the PCM sees? More linear fuel delivery and smoother. [/QUOTE]

Random media

My 6.4s

249

Betsy_on_DYNO

179278_1660325862800_1076760051_1780798_2226307_n

Billet harley grille

First truck

First day of lift new tires and wheels

IMG_20150419_200803_714

Close up of grille

In progress

Latest posts

OEM LED sport headlights
- Latest: ghohouston
- Today at 8:37 AM
2017+ 6.7 Aluminum Super Duty
Gauge cluster face plates
- Latest: crash86
- Sunday at 5:15 PM
6.0 Aftermarket
B
6.4 head gasket job cost
- Latest: bowhunter
- Sunday at 2:07 PM
6.4 Aftermarket
S
6R140 surging issue
- Latest: Smokin 6.0
- Sunday at 12:11 AM
6.7 Tech & FAQ
Won’t start
- Latest: psduser1
- Wednesday at 11:33 AM
7.3 Tech & FAQ

Members online

Gregoryjak

Total: 298 (members: 2, guests: 296)

Top