Knock Knock, *** Me

jimdawg185

Active member
Joined
May 22, 2011
Messages
1,869
Reaction score
0
Knowing what we have seen about this engine there was most likely a crush issue with the bearings. Fuel dilution would have been obvious on all rods and mains not just 3 of them.



I didn't go through the whole thread so I missed that part. But I would say a hydrodynamic film failure which would trigger an antiwear fail mode, would also not only effect three bearings unless it was a fluid flow failure because of airation and or cavitation somewhere. But then you could go back to fuel dilution as a possible source of the failure mode again because fuel dilution also decreases air release properties. And round and round. RCA would be the only true way to determine the failure mode, and the first thing we do is lubricant analysis, run Analytical Ferrography to determine the mode state. Then from there do the same with the failed bearings. But 98% of the time I can nail the mode with AF. Then it's just chasing the mode backwards.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

PsdPullerJr

Member
Joined
May 17, 2013
Messages
515
Reaction score
0
Location
Western PA
So is bearing failure becoming a popular thing these trucks now? Friend of mine put a new long block into an 11 with 82k miles on it, I'm pretty sure all stock, no ******s or tunes. Every rod bearing was wiped out and the crank scored up pretty good. Kinda blamed it on maintenance even tho things didn't look too bad inside but now I'm wondering how common this may be.
 

Wayne

Active member
Joined
May 23, 2011
Messages
2,540
Reaction score
8
Location
Twin Falls, Idaho
The short block showed up yesterday, but I couldn't touch it until today because of some other vehicle taking presedenece. I was able to spend most of today on it though.

These bearings are all from Erik's motor. I thought you guys might like to see the difference.


IMG_20170126_163545549.jpg



New '17 short block requires larger mount bracket bolts & brackets, as well as water pump plugs, and a couple other little things.

IMG_20170126_081939994.jpg



Just a little more work in the morning, and it'll be ready to install.

IMG_20170126_175456027.jpg
 

jimdawg185

Active member
Joined
May 22, 2011
Messages
1,869
Reaction score
0
The short block showed up yesterday, but I couldn't touch it until today because of some other vehicle taking presedenece. I was able to spend most of today on it though.



These bearings are all from Erik's motor. I thought you guys might like to see the difference.





IMG_20170126_163545549.jpg






New '17 short block requires larger mount bracket bolts & brackets, as well as water pump plugs, and a couple other little things.



IMG_20170126_081939994.jpg






Just a little more work in the morning, and it'll be ready to install.



IMG_20170126_175456027.jpg



Were that rod and main near each other (the failed ones)?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Wayne

Active member
Joined
May 23, 2011
Messages
2,540
Reaction score
8
Location
Twin Falls, Idaho
The pictured rods were on different journals, as the two that failed, shared a journal. The good one pictured was cyl 6. 3 and 7 failed. mains were "next to" each other. BTW, I'm not looking for somebody to diagnose the cause of failure for me, but anyone is more than welcome to speculate. :thumbup:
 

gfulton

New member
Joined
Mar 19, 2013
Messages
1,304
Reaction score
1
Location
Eliasville, Texas
The pictured rods were on different journals, as the two that failed, shared a journal. The good one pictured was cyl 6. 3 and 7 failed. mains were "next to" each other. BTW, I'm not looking for somebody to diagnose the cause of failure for me, but anyone is more than welcome to speculate. :thumbup:

Wayne you might wanna talk with Tadd about this......
 

Sportchassis06

New member
Joined
Dec 11, 2015
Messages
830
Reaction score
0
The pictured rods were on different journals, as the two that failed, shared a journal. The good one pictured was cyl 6. 3 and 7 failed. mains were "next to" each other. BTW, I'm not looking for somebody to diagnose the cause of failure for me, but anyone is more than welcome to speculate. :thumbup:
Easy to Speculate,when youre not doing the work!
 

getstroked27

New member
Joined
Jan 25, 2014
Messages
686
Reaction score
0
Location
Friendship, MD
Looks similar to the engines we tore up this past race season. Was there any other damage? torn up cylinder walls, piston skirts or anything like that? or was it just a bearing failure? I know there is about an 800 hp difference between the trucks, but we were running into both heat issues and crank walk. Seemed like the surface was getting too hot, eating the bearings then the crank would start moving around when it had a little wiggle room.....
 

Wayne

Active member
Joined
May 23, 2011
Messages
2,540
Reaction score
8
Location
Twin Falls, Idaho
thrust bearings looked perfect. only cylinder wall damage was some scuffing on 3 & 7. No skirt damage. the pistons in those cylinders made light contact with their valves, so those got replaced. They didn't hit hard enough to cause any damage to the heads, but valves in question were replaced just in case.
 

outacntrl

Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2011
Messages
111
Reaction score
0
Location
Clearwater, KS
The pictured rods were on different journals, as the two that failed, shared a journal. The good one pictured was cyl 6. 3 and 7 failed. mains were "next to" each other. BTW, I'm not looking for somebody to diagnose the cause of failure for me, but anyone is more than welcome to speculate.
So what was the cause of failure?

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
 

Wayne

Active member
Joined
May 23, 2011
Messages
2,540
Reaction score
8
Location
Twin Falls, Idaho
I strongly suspect the oil pump failed on that one Bustedknuckles. There's a TSB out there requiring a bunch of the '17 power strokes do an oil pump function test involving a 2400 - 2500 rpm 1/2 hr+ high idle, then an 8 hour cold soak and restart while monitoring rpm's and the low pressure oil switch. They anticipate it affecting less than 1% of the trucks, but that must have been in the 1%. This one is most likely a spun rod bearing as the root cause.
 

Wayne

Active member
Joined
May 23, 2011
Messages
2,540
Reaction score
8
Location
Twin Falls, Idaho
The truck's been done for a week now, and runs great. As I explained earlier, it spun a rod bearing, causing other subsequent damage. Oil quality was not to blame, so suspicion lies in insufficient bearing crush. We're just waiting on some paperwork on Erik's end involving lost documents needing duplicates and other hoops to jump through for warranty coverage, then it's back home to Cali.
 

04cr450

Active member
Joined
Aug 25, 2013
Messages
1,788
Reaction score
0
Location
harford county, maryland
The truck's been done for a week now, and runs great. As I explained earlier, it spun a rod bearing, causing other subsequent damage. Oil quality was not to blame, so suspicion lies in insufficient bearing crush. We're just waiting on some paperwork on Erik's end involving lost documents needing duplicates and other hoops to jump through for warranty coverage, then it's back home to Cali.


Wonderful to hear great job o everything! So the result just cough it up to bad luck? I knew it spun a bearing just seeing if anything else failed etc etc (I should have said that my fault)
 

Wayne

Active member
Joined
May 23, 2011
Messages
2,540
Reaction score
8
Location
Twin Falls, Idaho
Yeah, no identifiable user error. Nothing anyone could've done different in maintenance or driving to prevent this one. Just bad luck. Thankfully this is a very rare situation on these newer 6.7's.
 

Jomax

Active member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
8,576
Reaction score
7
Location
Arizona
Yeah, no identifiable user error. Nothing anyone could've done different in maintenance or driving to prevent this one. Just bad luck. Thankfully this is a very rare situation on these newer 6.7's.


I don't think it's luck anymore with Eric.. I'm surprised he hasn't given up on Ford entirely...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Latest posts

Members online

Top