Non vgt s369sxe billet upgrade time. HpPredictions???

6 L chevy eater · Dec 12, 2015

the 369sxe come with 80mm turbines, which compared to a 472 with an 83 turbine, id say flow is close to the same LB per min. and ive been running hybrids dam near a year now and truck makes good power AND will continue running hybrids

04cr450 · Dec 12, 2015

Charlie- I had a 64.5sxe prior to the 69 sxe and the power difference is noticeable but no where near the feel of a s472. The truck I rode in that has a 472 in it on only 225/100's and my setup had 205/75's so not that much difference.. the 72 pulls very hard up top compared to the 69 sxe.

Six_Sloww · Dec 12, 2015

Probably had an 87 turbine wheel, that would explain the big difference in top end

Harleyx · Dec 12, 2015

Guys....holy fumbling shiz... even with the t4 to vband adapter... brake stall is so easy, spools right up even with stock intake, this is a bad mama jama, by buddy's gt40 truck with a 1800 charger doesn't come close, needs tunes witg later lock up but it burns off tires at 65 plus , 4500 rpm shifts, nasty sounding and spools better than I could imagine

Harleyx · Dec 12, 2015

So freaki ng happy with this setup... cleans up 340s at 1.6 ms pulsewith ... can't wait to Gate it and spray itm.. it's 700 plus easy right now

Harleyx · Dec 12, 2015

Ccv eliminator was clutch and not a single blown boot, measuring 60 psi over 79 psi bp

HOOV3R · Dec 12, 2015

6 L chevy eater said:
the 369sxe come with 80mm turbines, which compared to a 472 with an 83 turbine, id say flow is close to the same LB per min. and ive been running hybrids dam near a year now and truck makes good power AND will continue running hybrids

Still a 74mm turbine exducer on the 369 vs a 83mm exducer on the 472. The 472 will definitely have more flow up top.

Harleyx · Dec 12, 2015

But the 74mm s300 will spool and be mu ch more street able hoover!

HOOV3R · Dec 12, 2015

Harleyx said:
But the 74mm s300 will spool and be mu ch more street able hoover!

I know, I've been running a 369 for months.

Harleyx · Dec 12, 2015

I loooooove this setup big thabks to smeding diesel for the ho ok up 750 bucks on the 369 supercore and a housing from mikes turbo for 100 bucks, 850 in the whole turbo, made my own drain for 10 bucks, made my own feed line 36 bucks, and fabbbed my own pedestal with t4 2 vband adapter for 150 bucks, roughly 1100 in the entire setup

Harleyx · Dec 12, 2015

HOOV3R said:
I know, I've been running a 369 for months.

Don't you ***ki ng love it? This bitch is bad

6 L chevy eater · Dec 12, 2015

HOOV3R said:
Still a 74mm turbine exducer on the 369 vs a 83mm exducer on the 472. The 472 will definitely have more flow up top.

the 83 inducer x74 exducer turbine in the s400 is what i was refering too, the 369 with an 80 mm inducer .

6 L chevy eater · Dec 12, 2015

Six_Sloww said:
Probably had an 87 turbine wheel, that would explain the big difference in top end

yes makes a big diff up top

6 L chevy eater · Dec 12, 2015

HOOV3R said:
I know, I've been running a 369 for months.[ ive been running two of them for about a month now, there nice chargers, move lots of air

Six_Sloww · Dec 12, 2015

6 L chevy eater said:
HOOV3R said:

I know, I've been running a 369 for months.[ ive been running two of them for about a month now, there nice chargers, move lots of air

Click to expand...

Your setup is quite a bit different from what we are debating here.. LOL

Six_Sloww · Dec 12, 2015

HOOV3R said:
Still a 74mm turbine exducer on the 369 vs a 83mm exducer on the 472. The 472 will definitely have more flow up top.

Actually it's this strange pattern where for some reason when people list specs of the s400 they list the turbine exducer but when listing specs for an s300 they list the turbine inducer.

The s400 typically has either an 83/74, 87/77, or 96/88.

The 369 has a 80/74.

I forgot the s472 comes with an 83/74. I still think it would make more power than a 369 but until someone proves either way it's purely speculation.

6 L chevy eater · Dec 12, 2015

Six_Sloww said:
Actually it's this strange pattern where for some reason when people list specs of the s400 they list the turbine exducer but when listing specs for an s300 they list the turbine inducer.

The s400 typically has either an 83/74, 87/77, or 96/88.

The 369 has a 80/74.

I forgot the s472 comes with an 83/74. I still think it would make more power than a 369 but until someone proves either way it's purely speculation.

enough said:thumbsup:

Harleyx · Dec 12, 2015

Six_Sloww said:
Actually it's this strange pattern where for some reason when people list specs of the s400 they list the turbine exducer but when listing specs for an s300 they list the turbine inducer.

The s400 typically has either an 83/74, 87/77, or 96/88.

The 369 has a 80/74.

I forgot the s472 comes with an 83/74. I still think it would make more power than a 369 but until someone proves either way it's purely speculation.

I've always wandered the same. It's stupid

Six_Sloww · Dec 12, 2015

6 L chevy eater said:
enough said:thumbsup:

I will agree that EVEN IF a 72/83 made more power on a 6.0 it probably wouldn't make enough more to justify the slower spoolup.

A 72/87 is a different story, cuz you can has more nitrous

lol

Harleyx · Dec 12, 2015

Rather have a s300 for the spool and borg th em selves said it will make more Cfm than the 472 lol I trust borg and like to drive my tru,k on the street could give a **** less what the difference is at wot between 3 mm on a turbine if I can drive it without smoking out the world duh lol