Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="retrosolutions, post: 684686, member: 1688"] The biggest difference with the new version is they can be run indefinitely without heat damage to themselves as they are temperature compensated. When on for normal reverse use they are all-around brighter, and at typical running time equal in measured forward output, only at extended run time are they less in forward intensity. They are much more uniform for distribution over the width of output. In relative intensity measurement, compared to the previous version the following data helps put it visually. (green is new 9W version with red showing maximum when driven to edge of CREE's absolute maximum ratings at the same temperature, blue is older version bulbs with the additional radial LEDs) [CENTER][img]http://www.retro-solutions.net/images/relluxCREEver1vsver2_2.png[/img][/CENTER] [url="http://www.retro-solutions.net"] [/url] [/QUOTE]

Verification

Random media

2003 F250 6.0

6_0_intake_4

449D49D7-F1F3-4D00-959A-19155E78D0B0

Kazakhstan

2012-10-13_23-19-40_738

20200503_155046

1996 F250 460

Latest posts

Truck slipping into 4th
- Latest: Powerstroke Cowboy
- Today at 1:27 PM
6.7 Tech
Do not recommend Choate Engineering
- Latest: DEEZUZ
- Wednesday at 10:22 PM
Newly Enlisted
A few turbo questions and a rant
- Latest: ghohouston
- Wednesday at 9:41 PM
7.3 Aftermarket
O
2011-2016 Radiator upgrade
- Latest: OtisCreekConstruction
- Wednesday at 6:17 PM
6.7 Tech
Performance shops
- Latest: DEEZUZ
- Tuesday at 8:42 AM
7.3 Performance

Members online

Mknp84

Total: 413 (members: 1, guests: 412)

Top