BW S369?

Chatham036

New member
Joined
Nov 18, 2013
Messages
209
Reaction score
0
Truck drives really nice with the 369, very responsive. Boost come on pretty effortless, trans tuning needs a little tweaking but other than that I really like the way it drives. For guys at low elevation I wouldn't hesitate to try this turbo, I think towing wouldn't be an issue either with in reason ( weight ). It drives good, power on tap, just need to dial in the trans.

What charger was installed prior to the 369?
Are you willing to give a comparison between the previous charger and this?
 

SEABEE08FX4

New member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
7,463
Reaction score
0
Location
Montgomery TX
What charger was installed prior to the 369?
Are you willing to give a comparison between the previous charger and this?

This is another guys 6.4 at the shop, he previously had a stock high pressure and a HTT 71 FMW low pressure. Its a lot stronger with the single 369 set up.

Did this replace the 468 in your sig?

No different truck. This is another guy here at the shops truck.

This one is mine.

11896144_10153400127451558_34708263585877567_n.jpg


This is his.

11866212_10153402773996558_3569751352395647704_n.jpg
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 1, 2012
Messages
5,868
Reaction score
0
Location
Athens, IL
186db05ba95fd5f8778e9293df871419.jpg


Got it on. Spool as good as the 366 nearly as I can tell, given what I'm driving it on lol. Seems to pull hard. We will see. This is definitely an application that will push it to the breaking point.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

HS-MotorsportsZane

New member
Joined
Aug 8, 2013
Messages
469
Reaction score
0
Is that on a common rail or 12 valve Morgan? We have found a few of these things laying around too 69,66,64.... Be on the dyno with data logging next week on the 6.7 ford. Hope the results are good, otherwise we may have to cast more parts��
 
Joined
Oct 1, 2012
Messages
5,868
Reaction score
0
Location
Athens, IL
Is that on a common rail or 12 valve Morgan? We have found a few of these things laying around too 69,66,64.... Be on the dyno with data logging next week on the 6.7 ford. Hope the results are good, otherwise we may have to cast more parts��


12 valve pulling truck. Workstock class around here. Running a 13mm pump, cam, all the other supporting stuff. It's a manual so we leave the line at 4500-5000. Actually put a clipped turbine back in the 369 for more flow and are running a 1.10 ported exhaust housing. If there is something that can break one of these I'll have a good shot at it.

We pulled tonight. Definitely has more power. Took third behind a good running duramax and our workstock 6.4. The ole 12v is closing the gap a little more in workstock with this turbo. Cleaned up the fuel some so we are throwing more at it tomorrow.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Powerstroke Man 6.4

Active member
Joined
Jan 10, 2012
Messages
4,037
Reaction score
3
12 valve pulling truck. Workstock class around here. Running a 13mm pump, cam, all the other supporting stuff. It's a manual so we leave the line at 4500-5000. Actually put a clipped turbine back in the 369 for more flow and are running a 1.10 ported exhaust housing. If there is something that can break one of these I'll have a good shot at it.

We pulled tonight. Definitely has more power. Took third behind a good running duramax and our workstock 6.4. The ole 12v is closing the gap a little more in workstock with this turbo. Cleaned up the fuel some so we are throwing more at it tomorrow.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Any videos of the pull?
 

obs7.3

New member
Joined
Jan 4, 2012
Messages
613
Reaction score
0
Location
Ohio
^^^^ This is what I'd like to know...
Or maybe to re-word the question, would the 366 be better on stock fuel than the 369?
 

Six_Sloww

New member
Joined
Dec 5, 2013
Messages
2,574
Reaction score
0
Location
Southeast MI
If it is you would hardly notice the difference. It has to spin a larger wheel; sure it has better dynamics and an unclipped turbine, if anything it probably spools just like (maybe slightly better than) a 366 which is impressive with a 3mm larger wheel.

Also depends on what engine you two are referring to?
 
Last edited:

Powerstroke Man 6.4

Active member
Joined
Jan 10, 2012
Messages
4,037
Reaction score
3
^^^^ This is what I'd like to know...
Or maybe to re-word the question, would the 366 be better on stock fuel than the 369?

My Billet S366 drives excellent on 6.4 with stock fuel, I bet the S369 would drive good and have more power, I heard they spool up real quick.
 

SEABEE08FX4

New member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
7,463
Reaction score
0
Location
Montgomery TX
What would the 369 drive like on stock fuel?

^^^^ This is what I'd like to know...
Or maybe to re-word the question, would the 366 be better on stock fuel than the 369?

Drives really good, I'd say this S369 spools better than my old Bullseye S366 I had. I think the unclipped turbine wheel helps spool up for daily driving. Cruising at 80 mph the EGT's were at 768 heading to NW Texas.
 

08Monster

New member
Joined
Sep 8, 2013
Messages
1,871
Reaction score
0
Drives really good, I'd say this S369 spools better than my old Bullseye S366 I had. I think the unclipped turbine wheel helps spool up for daily driving. Cruising at 80 mph the EGT's were at 768 heading to NW Texas.
Wow, I'd be at 1100 cruising at 80.
 

Latest posts

Members online

Top