jdgleason
Active member
With 2 72's lol
With 2 72's lol
Mike@MPD
New member
60's and the s472 on mine still had some fuel left over. I was happy with the setup other than having a hurt motor. Very driveable with decent fuel mileage
Sequential6.4L
New member
- Joined
- May 19, 2011
- Messages
- 193
- Reaction score
- 0
60% or 60hp?
jdgleason
Active member
Mike@MPD
New member
% aint got time for that little fuel lol
Sequential6.4L
New member
- Joined
- May 19, 2011
- Messages
- 193
- Reaction score
- 0
nice, will a dragon fire push enough fuel to 60%'ers? i guess there was some reliability issues but rcd said that was worked out, not wanting to run dual pumps.
Beans71086
New member
Yes, that's what mike was running.
Jgon08
Active member
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2011
- Messages
- 1,853
- Reaction score
- 0
I'd like to hear more about the issues worked out. I was under the impression they stoping making a upgraded k16 due to to many issues.
Wayne
Active member
They stopped making them because more often than not, they are piles of crap that destroy injectors when they go out.
Strokin6.4
New member
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2012
- Messages
- 1,117
- Reaction score
- 0
Mike didn't you run 60s with a 2.3 pw? Probably no smokier than 100s with a 1.7 pw. We'll see
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
01PSD
New member
LULZ and now they're testing a modded CP4.2.... :badidea:
Erikclaw
Active member
Well since it pretty much runs out of fuel with 150's I figured 200's and some tuning should make it run stronger and I bet the big charger would like it more too.
3brorce
Active member
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2011
- Messages
- 3,122
- Reaction score
- 0
Makes sense.
3brorce
Active member
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2011
- Messages
- 3,122
- Reaction score
- 0
Same goes for all of there pumps really. Have trouble keeping up no matter the truck make.
LovinPSDs
New member
Just so I understand the logic here, even though this is completely off topic...
If you were mathematically injecting the exact same amount of fuel which should (in theory) make more power?? Big nozzles + less PW or Smaller nozzles and larger PW??
If you were mathematically injecting the exact same amount of fuel which should (in theory) make more power?? Big nozzles + less PW or Smaller nozzles and larger PW??
Strokin6.4
New member
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2012
- Messages
- 1,117
- Reaction score
- 0
Mathematically you should be able to make the same amount playing with the pw with a bigger nozzle. But you have room to play... if you want more bump the pw up .1 ms. If you want a little more bump it up more. Once your at max pw with a smaller nozzle your done playing its all you got. Also in THEORY bigger nozzles and less pw should decrease cylinder pressure because its a quicker burst of more fuel, rather than less fuel for a longer period of time chasing the piston on the down stroke.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
SEABEE08FX4
New member
It depends on how much air you have and if you have twin injection pumps or not. If you run a big nozzle and don't have the air or enough pump you have to pull PW back or else it will have low RP and smoke like a freight train, it would be a dog too. If you don't have a lot of air or pump you can run a smaller nozzle with more PW too, but all of this is loosely stated as percentages of nozzle and pump or pumps as well as turbo sizing all depend on what PW you can safely and effectively run. If you have enough air and fuel to support a large nozzle you can crank the PW up to an extent of the abilities of your set up.
jdgleason
Active member
Well said.
Wayne
Active member
You guys have me convinced. I'm pulling out my injectors, and going for 400% nozzles, and control it with limited pulse width :thumbsup:
