MPD budget single turbo kit reviews?

Sequential6.4L

New member
Joined
May 19, 2011
Messages
193
Reaction score
0
whats the price on the budget kit? i remember mpd saying there manifolds make a big difference with spool up, might be worth it to go with the full kit if you want it driveable as it can be.
 

6.4psd916

New member
Joined
Sep 14, 2011
Messages
1,139
Reaction score
0
Location
Roseville , CA
What turbo do they use in the 66 kit? It has a cast wheel option and a billet 11 blade wheel option. Says nothing about them using a batmo wheeled charger, which sounds good to me, considering their recent failures. Maybe its their tct wheel. I guess its suppose to outflow the batmo, maybe that's why is $400 more for that wheel.
 
Last edited:

jdgleason

Active member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
7,993
Reaction score
0
Location
Fort Collins, CO
Who would run 15% nozzles lmao. My trucks runs WAY better with 30% nozzles and made 691 with x street. Eric said if I wOuld have put his cusTom tune back in its usually a 40 hp gain with the added timing and fuel. I don't understand what usable power is. If I run a 11.3 and you run a 12.0, I pull 1st place and you pull 5th place your argument of usuable power is dumb. I don't need 35psi of boost at the touch of a pedal to cruise around town buddy. And maybe you should get your facts straight 15% do maintain in a lot of trucks with stock hpfp idk where you got your panties in a bunch with 30% nozzles. Even the man dynoing JDs truck said he'd like to see the test done with bigger nozzles because at 15% and low rail pressure there isn't much fuel over stock to make the difference up.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2

Wayne's truck made 1,008 hp un corrected with 15% nozzles on 37" tires. Guess he's retarded... Laugh your ass off.

Mike dillehays truck made 723 with stock nozzles. Mine made 694 with stock nozzles. Jim hallers truck made 710 with stock nozzles. Guess we are all retarded cuz were running a nozzle 30% smaller than yours. We just aren't in the cool kids club because we're not running extra special tuning from Eric.
 

Strokin6.4

New member
Joined
Apr 19, 2012
Messages
1,117
Reaction score
0
Wayne's truck made 1,008 hp un corrected with 15% nozzles on 37" tires. Guess he's retarded... Laugh your ass off.

Mike dillehays truck made 723 with stock nozzles. Mine made 694 with stock nozzles. Jim hallers truck made 710 with stock nozzles. Guess we are all retarded cuz were running a nozzle 30% smaller than yours. We just aren't in the cool kids club because we're not running extra special tuning from Eric.

Did I call anyone retarded? And what do I care what you made on stock nozzles anyway? I'm confused on your guy's arguement towards me because I said I was going to run 100% nozzles and pull the pw back on the street? Like are you argueing that your stock nozzles are going to make more power than dual fuelers and 100% nozzles? I mean why do I care if it smokes at the track... have you ever been to a pro mod sled pull?

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
 

Strokin6.4

New member
Joined
Apr 19, 2012
Messages
1,117
Reaction score
0
Dallas Penn made 890 on 38s with 100% on a single 71. What's Wayne's highest fuel only on 15%'s?

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
 

Dzchey21

Active member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
11,784
Reaction score
0
Location
wyoming
Everyone needs to check out my video in the vgt vs non vgt thread. Its boring because with proper tuning a 100% nozzle is totally streetable
 

jdgleason

Active member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
7,993
Reaction score
0
Location
Fort Collins, CO
Did I call anyone retarded? And what do I care what you made on stock nozzles anyway? I'm confused on your guy's arguement towards me because I said I was going to run 100% nozzles and pull the pw back on the street? Like are you argueing that your stock nozzles are going to make more power than dual fuelers and 100% nozzles? I mean why do I care if it smokes at the track... have you ever been to a pro mod sled pull?

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
I read retarded somewhere... Not really my point. My whole point was that I still really don't see an advantage to having way bigger nozzles than turbos will support. Pull back fuel to say you pulled back fuel? I'm not talking street able even right now. I just don't see a need for you to step up nozzles on a charger that won't support it. If you have dyno or track evidence (slips/graphs) then I will stand corrected.

My point with the stock nozzle argument is what did you gain with your 30% nozzle and tuning? It seems like you're right in the neighborhood of all the other trucks limited by the stock hpfp? I made that same power with much less smoke and nozzle. That's really all I'm getting at.

Craig's truck with 100% nozzles and a 475 and spray STILL smoked... There's STILL unburned fuel. So what would make you assume your 72 needs 40% more fuel?
 

Matt

Active member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
1,897
Reaction score
0
Location
Minnesota
These niggaz is raw in here. So in case I missed it, what is the negative of running a larger nozzle and pulling fuel back?
 

Powerstroked162

On Da Juice
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
10,069
Reaction score
0
Location
Wa. State
Who would run 15% nozzles lmao. My trucks runs WAY better with 30% nozzles and made 691 with x street. Eric said if I wOuld have put his cusTom tune back in its usually a 40 hp gain with the added timing and fuel. I don't understand what usable power is. If I run a 11.3 and you run a 12.0, I pull 1st place and you pull 5th place your argument of usuable power is dumb. I don't need 35psi of boost at the touch of a pedal to cruise around town buddy. And maybe you should get your facts straight 15% do maintain in a lot of trucks with stock hpfp idk where you got your panties in a bunch with 30% nozzles. Even the man dynoing JDs truck said he'd like to see the test done with bigger nozzles because at 15% and low rail pressure there isn't much fuel over stock to make the difference up.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2

60hp nozzles are 15% overstock... sooooo not sure what you are missing but it's a very popular nozzle size among 6.4 owners. Your truck making 690 with 30% nozzles doesn't impress me, at all. Even if it makes another 40rwhp like you claim, that still doesn't prove anything, other than it's a giant waste of money and the only point in doing it is to blow smoke like a queer or sound like a queer bragging to others that you have big nozzles, either way, it's gay. Also, I don't speak for Mike Haller so I can't say what he believes. All I know is that what you are telling people, isn't true and doesn't work. You don't have the data to back it up either. Giant. Waste. Of. Breath.

Did I call anyone retarded? And what do I care what you made on stock nozzles anyway? I'm confused on your guy's arguement towards me because I said I was going to run 100% nozzles and pull the pw back on the street? Like are you argueing that your stock nozzles are going to make more power than dual fuelers and 100% nozzles? I mean why do I care if it smokes at the track... have you ever been to a pro mod sled pull?

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2

What you said that started all this was 15% nozzles were a waste because a stock HPFP could maintain 30% nozzles. Which isn't true, and you can't prove(with documentation) otherwise.

and what the *** does a pro-mod sled pull have to do with your daily driver being an over-fueled mess. Do you honestly think an s472 is matched well with a set of 100% nozzles? Haddox runs 100% nozzles with a massive s480, I know he hasn't really had the chance to mash on it yet but I will be very suprised to hear that his charger cleans that amount of fuel up. So I guess what my point is, is why run a porn stars asshole for a nozzle when you could scale it back and match your turbo setup? All I can think of for me feeling that way, is what's been done with less nozzle and larger turbos. Hell, leave your 30% nozzles on there with dual pumps and give it hell. Corsilli made north of 900 back in '10 with a similar setup on spray. Or do whatever you want, I don't really care. My biggest problem at the moment is the continuous claiming that a stock HPFP will maintain 30% nozzles.

.
 

Wayne

Active member
Joined
May 23, 2011
Messages
2,540
Reaction score
8
Location
Twin Falls, Idaho
Powerstrokin15: Gotcha. You got twin pumps too? I've never heard of any truck with a single stock hpfp maintain max desired rail pressure on anything larger than 15% over nozzle, and 2.2+ PW, and those are few, and far between.

To those curious about my power output, my dyno runs last week put it right at 700 /1380 to the ground. A couple runs were a little higher, and a couple a little lower, but that's about average. It's a stock housing test combo running 76 and 59 mm inducers and 110's (50% over). Stock gears, and 38's. The big tires and 3.73's do hurt the dyno numbers, but really don't care for how i use it. It'd probably be 750ish if i went back to smaller tires, but oh, well. No doubt I could make more power fuel only with larger nozzles, but it only cleans up to a haze WOT, and I'm not interested in being "that guy" who blows black everywhere I go, especially as it's my daily driver. Egt's also get up beyond where I like them, so larger turbos are on the list.
 

powerstrokin15

New member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
5,594
Reaction score
0
Location
Charleston, WV
ill be dynoing mine soon.. but stock pump, a-1000 low pressure with bowl/cooler delete.

i have no clue on power... but will know soon. i just wanted to try it.
 
Last edited:

Ipkyss

New member
Joined
Jul 16, 2011
Messages
1,032
Reaction score
0
Its threads likes this that remind me how many people buy trucks with no intention of actually using them as trucks. If it wasn't for me needing a truck, and living in the northeast. I would have bought a corvette and had something stupidly fast for the same money.

How do these single turbo kits spool compared to a tuned stock turbo 6.0?
 

Latest posts

Members online

Top