Also, Charles, I got a look at your posted calibration. It's not my place to say what's right or wrong with it if it works for you, but I could make three suggestions right off the bat although it would suit MY driving style....probably not yours....as well as clean up some cold-start issues.
That's the whole point. It's a proof. Instead of everybody working on the task in their own dark cave somewhere.
Excuse the ICP table.... I literally ran the values straight over and sliced a ravine in it for idle. As I said, I haven't made love to this file yet, I basically just ran down the road and it was surprisingly good, plus I haven't had much time to do much.
Aside from that, and a disparity in ICP running up to ~3200 ish on the top on the scanner, even though I have 3000 in the map, I don't know any better as to what's messed up.
But I sure will appreciate the criticism.
I'll put that calibration in the pickup in the video and see what happens (when it warms up, of course in a couple of days). I can't promise anything will come of it though since my injectors HATE 200% calibrations for other trucks.
How can you reliably run my program on a non Txxxxx whatever pcm? Sounds like a cut and paste nightmare. How can you be sure it will run the same? I have suuuuuuuper low sucess doing this. Always some kind of parameter or function in the background totally altering something in a different way.
I'm not concerned in terms of "if you like the program or not", you can see that by looking at it in the proper template anyway. I ask more as a question of how in the hell you could reliably flop a program from one template to another like that.
Fwiw.... if your truck is an auto, and you did get the program I posted to come over as it drives in my truck, I think you just might like it. Unless of course, the thing with the crazy slow injectors you spoke of ruins it for you.
Regardless, I'm curious to see what your thoughts are. Or those of anyone who's pulled it up.
Lastly.... I had no idea we were both cruising around in basically stock trucks with 200 nozzles... I swapped the turbo because the late model superduty turbo is junk and the 38R was laying on my floor.
And I wouldn't recommend a 200 for a grocery getter. That's why
my grocery getter is a bone stock excursion that my wife drives!
I have advocated that the 200 EDM takes over at around 300hp. I however wouldn't be surprised if when AT full power, the nozzle weren't actually already more efficient than stock at even sub 300rwhp. It's then more a case of usage. If the truck's hooked to 16,000lbs all the time, the 200 wins because you're going to be deep in desired power all the time. If the truck runs around empty, then the stock nozzle would win because desired power would probably be in the 80hp range or something most of the time where the 200 EDM is probably less efficient.
