forcefed6.4ford
New member
Wow. Have you two ever made a cluster *** of this thread...
Wow. Have you two ever made a cluster *** of this thread...
Just wash your mouth out with a revolver.
I'm surprised considering you bit everything else I've done.
I guess, maybe you didn't read Wayne's post where he quoted me a bunch of times.
You're not saying anything different than anyone else. Because of that, I'm not changing my questions.
No one owes me any explanation. I've already stated that.
Ive been told I dont think like the consumer all the time and I guess what I said before I thought would have been enough. Here is the answer I figure you were looking for.
The pistons have been tested in actual engines under the same conditions as engines that did crack pistons and they did not crack. Since they did not crack where the previous design did, then we can state they are stronger. Do you really think this amount of money would have been spent without testing more than just computer simulations.
Out of curiousity what is the compression dropped to by cutting the lip out. 15 something I figure. Have you spoke with rudy on the cold blooded characteristics of low compression? like what his drag truck has
I just saw a post by Doug saying removing the lip makes a 1cc difference in the bowls and compression drops from 17.5:1 to 17.0625:1
Well Josh should have his back soon enough. Hope he does a compression test. That will be definitive.
Saw it on Facebook